Dr. Pitlik, László associate professor, head of
department (pitlik@miau.gau.hu)
Pásztor, Márta prof.`s assistant (marta@miau.gau.hu)
Popovics, Attila prof.`s assistant
(popovics@miau.gau.hu)
Bunkóczi, László prof.`s assistant
(blaszlo@miau.gau.hu)
Pető, István PhD-student (ipeto@miau.gau.hu)
Szent István University (SZIE),
Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences
Institute of Methodology and Business Analyses, Department of Business
Informatics
Agricultural
specific QA preconditions of e-content providing in the case of getting to the
governmental portal
The lecture deals with the QA aspects (legal, technological,
institutional and management) of e-content service as the central question of
the problems of e-content service in agriculture, raised by the MEH (Prime
Ministers Office) tender dealing with the development of e-government. The
Department of Business Informatics of SZIE has been following the trends of the
national and international e-content providing and acts itself as an active
e-content provider. Along the experiences numerous critical points got focus,
which may induce some policies (only hypothetical type so far) which could help
avoiding the faulty e-content providing and can be interpreted as a type of
standard (http://miau.gau.hu/magisz/2002/magisztervezet.doc,
http://interm.gtk.gau.hu/miau/38/kshphare.ppt).
Some critical aspects/symptoms (occurred internationally too), which should be
treated as necessity:
-
There isn’t anyone (legally and institutionally)
responsible so far, for most part of the agricultural (rural development)
data-, map-, and document fortune, therefore there isn’t any meta-database
about resources, the accessing rights, and the minimum level of the technical
service is not cleared. There is no Agricultural Informatical Strategy at all.
-
In some institutes – concerned in data collection –
there is neither any consistency-check methodology nor institutional/legal
frame system, therefore some data (and the applications based on those values)
can be proved as inconsistent.
-
The providers of the analysis are not in a real
competitive market, therefore the publication of the goodness of the analyses
and similar reference data sets is usually eventual.
-
In the frame of Research and Development (in the
absence of legit directives and clear objectives, and because of the
uncoordinated tender systems) mainly only well executable (and foreseeable)
activities takes place, therefore the methodological renewal, the spread of
innovation and handling/ solving real theoretical problems takes place only
eventually. Is that Research and Development System authentic, where all the
tenders are success stories?
-
There is not a present system for correcting,
disclosing and imposing sanctions against faulty services.
Until we don’t have the legal-, technological- and checking aspects,
and, on the level of strategies, we don’t have any directives in the front for
e-content providers, the partially ruled and checked services may raise
numerous legal and marketing dilemmas, from constitutional problems through the
rules of competition and data-protection to the question of consumer
protection.